You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mussels: The forgotten fauna of regulated rivers. A case study of the Caney Fork River
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rrr.3450080110 |
| Authors |
James B. Layzer, Mark E. Gordon, Robert M. Anderson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
#39
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,297
of 83,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
#18
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.