You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian W. Tang, Linsey C. Marr, Raymond Tellier, Stephanie J. Dancer |
| Abstract |
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has had a wide-ranging and profound impact on how we think about the transmission of respiratory viruses This review outlines the basis on which we should consider all respiratory viruses as aerosol-transmissible infections, in order to improve our control of these pathogens in both healthcare and community settings. We present recent studies to support the aerosol transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and some older studies to demonstrate the aerosol transmissibility of other, more familiar seasonal respiratory viruses. Current knowledge on how these respiratory viruses are transmitted, and the way we control their spread, is changing. We need to embrace these changes to improve the care of patients in hospitals and care homes including others who are vulnerable to severe disease in community settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 17 | 17% |
| United States | 13 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 88% |
| Scientists | 5 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 1 | 9% |
| Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#827,637
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
#10
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,108
of 428,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them