You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cognitive map debate in insects: A historical perspective on what is at stake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.12.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelle Dhein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Germany | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 3 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,127,082
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences
#108
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,800
of 423,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them