↓ Skip to main content

発達障害児における文章理解の指導 : 情緒状態の「原因」を推論する行動の獲得(原著)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 384)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
発達障害児における文章理解の指導 : 情緒状態の「原因」を推論する行動の獲得(原著)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, March 1999
DOI 10.24468/jjbt.25.1_7
Authors

奥田 健次, 井上 雅彦, 山本 淳一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,382,121
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#1
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#592
of 36,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them