↓ Skip to main content

Humans with inherited MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiencies are predisposed to hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
117 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Humans with inherited MyD88 and IRAK-4 deficiencies are predisposed to hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia
Published in
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1084/jem.20220170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana García-García, Rebeca Pérez de Diego, Carlos Flores, Darawan Rinchai, Jordi Solé-Violán, Àngela Deyà-Martínez, Blanca García-Solis, José M. Lorenzo-Salazar, Elisa Hernández-Brito, Anna-Lisa Lanz, Leen Moens, Giorgia Bucciol, Mohamed Almuqamam, Joseph B. Domachowske, Elena Colino, Juan Luis Santos-Perez, Francisco M. Marco, Claudio Pignata, Aziz Bousfiha, Stuart E. Turvey, Stefanie Bauer, Filomeen Haerynck, Javier Gonzalo Ocejo-Vinyals, Francisco Lendinez, Seraina Prader, Nora Naumann-Bartsch, Jana Pachlopnik Schmid, Catherine M. Biggs, Kyla Hildebrand, Alexandra Dreesman, Miguel Ángel Cárdenes, Fatima Ailal, Ibtihal Benhsaien, Giuliana Giardino, Agueda Molina-Fuentes, Claudia Fortuny, Swetha Madhavarapu, Daniel H. Conway, Carolina Prando, Laire Schidlowski, María Teresa Martínez de Saavedra Álvarez, Rafael Alfaro, Felipe Rodríguez de Castro, Gerhard Kindle, Nizar Mahlaoui, Markus G. Seidel, Lougaris Vassilios, Mikko R.J. Seppänen, Laurent Abel, Alessandro Aiuti, Saleh Al-Muhsen, Fahd Al-Mulla, Mark S. Anderson, Evangelos Andreakos, Andrés A. Arias, Hagit Baris Feldman, Alexandre Belot, Catherine M. Biggs, Dusan Bogunovic, Alexandre Bolze, Anastasiia Bondarenko, Ahmed A. Bousfiha, Petter Brodin, Yenan Bryceson, Carlos D. Bustamante, Manish J. Butte, Giorgio Casari, John Christodoulou, Antonio Condino-Neto, Stefan N. Constantinescu, Megan A. Cooper, Clifton L. Dalgard, Murkesh Desai, Beth A. Drolet, Jamila El Baghdadi, Sara Espinosa-Padilla, Jacques Fellay, Carlos Flores, José Luis Franco, Antoine Froidure, Peter K. Gregersen, Bodo Grimbacher, Filomeen Haerynck, David Hagin, Rabih Halwani, Lennart Hammarström, James R. Heath, Sarah E. Henrickson, Elena W.Y. Hsieh, Eystein Husebye, Kohsuke Imai, Yuval Itan, Erich D. Jarvis, Timokratis Karamitros, Kai Kisand, Cheng-Lung Ku, Yu-Lung Lau, Yun Ling, Carrie L. Lucas, Tom Maniatis, Davood Mansouri, László Maródi, Isabelle Meyts, Joshua D. Milner, Kristina Mironska, Trine H. Mogensen, Tomohiro Morio, Lisa F.P. Ng, Luigi D. Notarangelo, Antonio Novelli, Giuseppe Novelli, Cliona O’Farrelly, Satoshi Okada, Keisuke Okamoto, Tayfun Ozcelik, Qiang Pan-Hammarström, Jean W. Pape, Rebecca Perez de Diego, David S. Perlin, Graziano Pesole, Anna M. Planas, Carolina Prando, Aurora Pujol, Lluis Quintana-Murci, Sathishkumar Ramaswamy, Laurent Renia, Igor Resnick, Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego, Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu, Anna Sediva, Mikko R.J. Seppänan, Mohammed Shahrooei, Anna Shcherbina, Ondrej Slaby, Andrew L. Snow, Pere Soler-Palacín, András N. Spaan, Ivan Tancevski, Stuart G. Tangye, Ahmad Abou Tayoun, Stuart E. Turvey, K M Furkan Uddin, Mohammed J. Uddin, Diederik van de Beek, Donald C. Vinh, Horst von Bernuth, Joost Wauters, Mayana Zatz, Pawel Zawadzki, Helen C. Su, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Isabelle Meyts, Fabian Hauck, Anne Puel, Paul Bastard, Bertrand Boisson, Emmanuelle Jouanguy, Laurent Abel, Aurélie Cobat, Qian Zhang, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Laia Alsina, Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 31 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 36 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2025.
All research outputs
#344,747
of 34,547,233 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#138
of 13,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,131
of 452,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#3
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,547,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.