↓ Skip to main content

CRT植込み術における単純CTによる冠静脈と横隔神経の解剖学的評価の有用性

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRT植込み術における単純CTによる冠静脈と横隔神経の解剖学的評価の有用性
Published in
Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology, April 2019
DOI 10.5105/jse.39.16
Authors

徳留 大剛, 小和瀬 晋弥, 鈴木 穣, 寺田 直正, 伊藤 浩一, 前垣 雅治, 増田 慶太, 長田 淳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology
#37
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,738
of 367,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.