You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social inequalities in famine mortality in the manorial system of the tsarist Russian province of Livland in the mid‐1840s
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic History Review, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ehr.13246 |
| Authors |
Kersti Lust, Martin Klesment, Hannaliis Jaadla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,374,136
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Economic History Review
#264
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,102
of 425,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic History Review
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.