You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
All intraoperative hypotension is not created equal – A call for an individualized approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111076 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ashish K Khanna, Alexander Zarbock, Matthieu Legrand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 28 | 17% |
United States | 12 | 7% |
Ecuador | 9 | 5% |
Colombia | 8 | 5% |
Italy | 5 | 3% |
Spain | 5 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 3% |
India | 3 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Other | 28 | 17% |
Unknown | 58 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 143 | 87% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 7% |
Scientists | 9 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#441,547
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#10
of 1,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,289
of 426,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,882 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.