You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of a Clinical Risk-based Classification System in a Large Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Real-world Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.02.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arun J. Sanyal, Breda Munoz, Kenneth Cusi, A. Sidney Barritt, Mark Muthiah, Andrea R. Mospan, K. Rajender Reddy, Roberto Firpi-Morell, Paul J. Thuluvath, Kalyan Ram Bhamidimarri, Michael W. Fried, TARGET-NASH Investigators, Manal Abdelmalek, Humberto Aguilar, Aijaz Ahmed, Alina Allen, Sarah Barlow, Sid Barritt, David Bernstein, Kaylan Bhamidimarri, Liana Billings, Kyle Brown, Robert Brown, Karen Corbin, Kenneth Cusi, Andrew deLemos, Karan Emerick, Roberto Firpi-Morell, Maged Adel Ghali, Zachary Henry, Whitney Jackson, Sujit Janardhan, Mohammad Kabbany, Nyingi Kemmer, David Koch, Justin Kupec, Charles Landis, Mary Katherine Lawrence, Cynthia Levy, Steven Lidofsky, Anna Lok, Velimir Luketic, Enrique Martinez, Craig McClain, Patrick McKiernan, Ellen Mitchell, Mazen Noureddin, Sirish Palle, Yen Pham, David Pound, Rajender Reddy, Fredric Regenstein, Mary Rinella, Fedja Rochling, Bryan Rudolph, Vinod Rustgi, Adnan Said, Niharika Samala, Souvik Sarkar, Kenneth Sherman, Mitchell Shiffman, Coleman Smith, Jawahar Taunk, Brent Tetri, Paul Thuluvath, Huy Trinh, Elizabeth Verna, Miriam Vos, L. Michael Weiss, Mark Wong, Kathleen Wyne, Stavra Xanthakos |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 502. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#64,822
of 34,306,620 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#23
of 6,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,628
of 452,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#2
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.