↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based and adverse-effects analyses of cupping therapy in musculoskeletal and sports rehabilitation: A systematic and evidence-based review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 804)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
39 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
22 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence-based and adverse-effects analyses of cupping therapy in musculoskeletal and sports rehabilitation: A systematic and evidence-based review
Published in
Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, January 2023
DOI 10.3233/bmr-210242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 4%
Other 6 3%
Lecturer 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 149 73%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 152 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2026.
All research outputs
#836,085
of 34,666,344 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
#9
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,651
of 533,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,666,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.