↓ Skip to main content

Advantages and feasibility of intercostal nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Overview of attention for article published in Postgraduate Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advantages and feasibility of intercostal nerve block in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)
Published in
Postgraduate Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1080/00325481.2023.2187959
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linlin Wang, Lihui Ge, Yi Ren

Abstract

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been successfully used worldwide as a minimally invasive method of thoracoscopic surgery. Although pain was significantly reduced after VATS, acute postoperative pain was still significant. This study aimed to assess the advantages and feasibility of intercostal nerve block in uniportal VATS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of perioperative data from 280 consecutive patients who underwent uniportal VATS at our institution between May 2021 and February 2022. The patients were assigned to either Group A (142 patients with 3 intercostal nerves blocked) or Group B (138 patients with 5 intercostal nerves blocked). We analyzed the perioperative data of both groups and utilized repeated measures ANOVA to determine the difference in postoperative pain between the two groups across time. A total of 280 patients underwent successful uniportal VATS during the study period. There were no significant differences between Group A and Group B in terms of age, gender, pulmonary function, arterial blood gas analysis, laterality, incision location, nodule size, nodule location, operative time, blood loss, drainage time, length of hospital stays, tumor stage, or postoperative complications. Furthermore, no surgical or 30-day postoperative mortalities occurred. Using repeated measures ANOVA, we found that the intercostal nerve block had significant effects on the group, time, and interaction terms group × time (P < 0.05). Intercostal nerve block is safe and effective, and is associated with simple, accurate, and high patient satisfaction as opposed to other postoperative analgesics in uniportal VATS. Blocking five intercostal nerves may be more beneficial for effective postoperative pain management. Nevertheless, further confirmation through prospective randomized controlled trials is required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,989,411
of 23,972,543 outputs
Outputs from Postgraduate Medicine
#844
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,586
of 423,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postgraduate Medicine
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,972,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.