↓ Skip to main content

Stable isotope compositions of gases and vegetation near naturally burning coal

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable isotope compositions of gases and vegetation near naturally burning coal
Published in
Nature, January 1984
DOI 10.1038/307254a0
Authors

Jim D. Gleason, T. Kurtis Kyser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Professor 3 16%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 32%
Environmental Science 5 26%
Chemistry 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,514
of 91,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,591
of 35,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#61
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.