↓ Skip to main content

Access to Secondary Mental Health Services in a Cohort of New Zealand Mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Access to Secondary Mental Health Services in a Cohort of New Zealand Mothers
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10597-016-0042-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To explore access to secondary mental health services for New Zealand women during pregnancy and for up to 1 year post-delivery. A retrospective cohort analysis of public hospital maternity data linked to mental health collections. 27 in 1000 pregnancies were associated with access to secondary mental health services (736/27,153). Independent of ethnicity, young age (<20 years) was associated with access (RR1.84; 95 %CI 1.42-2.38; P < .0001). Smoking (1.48; 1.24-1.78; P < .0001), alcohol (1.3; 0.97-1.71; P < .0001) and substance use (3.57; 2.61-4.88; P < .0001) during pregnancy were independent risk factors associated with access. Antenatal period provides an opportunity for navigating to services to ensure timely access to secondary mental health services.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#1,236
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,297
of 354,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#25
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.