↓ Skip to main content

The age curves of sulfur and oxygen isotopes in marine sulfate and their mutual interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, January 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The age curves of sulfur and oxygen isotopes in marine sulfate and their mutual interpretation
Published in
ADS, January 1980
DOI 10.1016/0009-2541(80)90047-9
Authors

George E. Claypool, William T. Holser, Isaac R. Kaplan, Hitoshi Sakai, Israel Zak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 285 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 24%
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Professor 12 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 183 62%
Environmental Science 15 5%
Engineering 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 69 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,637
of 27,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,905
of 28,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#22
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.