↓ Skip to main content

Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review

Overview of attention for article published in Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 527)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
90 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
37 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
bluesky
5 Bluesky users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Poor Translatability of Biomedical Research Using Animals — A Narrative Review
Published in
Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, March 2023
DOI 10.1177/02611929231157756
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Student > Master 24 7%
Researcher 23 7%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 198 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 208 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 266. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2026.
All research outputs
#172,641
of 34,609,551 outputs
Outputs from Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
#2
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,938
of 453,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,609,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them