You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces DNA damage, through CHK1 degradation and impaired 53BP1 recruitment, and cellular senescence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Cell Biology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41556-023-01096-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ubaldo Gioia, Sara Tavella, Pamela Martínez-Orellana, Giada Cicio, Andrea Colliva, Marta Ceccon, Matteo Cabrini, Ana C. Henriques, Valeria Fumagalli, Alessia Paldino, Ettore Presot, Sreejith Rajasekharan, Nicola Iacomino, Federica Pisati, Valentina Matti, Sara Sepe, Matilde I. Conte, Sara Barozzi, Zeno Lavagnino, Tea Carletti, Maria Concetta Volpe, Paola Cavalcante, Matteo Iannacone, Chiara Rampazzo, Rossana Bussani, Claudio Tripodo, Serena Zacchigna, Alessandro Marcello, Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,661 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 315 | 12% |
| United States | 209 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 61 | 2% |
| Canada | 49 | 2% |
| Germany | 37 | 1% |
| Australia | 31 | 1% |
| Spain | 27 | 1% |
| France | 25 | <1% |
| Italy | 23 | <1% |
| Other | 195 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1689 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2448 | 92% |
| Scientists | 114 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 70 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 26 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1418. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,860
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#2
of 4,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266
of 426,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.