↓ Skip to main content

Beach-cusp formation

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Geology, January 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beach-cusp formation
Published in
Marine Geology, January 1979
DOI 10.1016/0025-3227(79)90100-2
Authors

Asbury H. Sallenger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 8%
Australia 1 8%
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Lecturer 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 54%
Engineering 3 23%
Mathematics 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Marine Geology
#420
of 1,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,179
of 26,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Geology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them