↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation of Emotions in Laughter at the Behavioral Level

Overview of attention for article published in Emotion, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differentiation of Emotions in Laughter at the Behavioral Level
Published in
Emotion, January 2009
DOI 10.1037/a0015692
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although laughter is important in human social interaction, its role as a communicative signal is poorly understood. Because laughter is expressed in various emotional contexts, the question arises as to whether different emotions are communicated. In the present study, participants had to appraise 4 types of laughter sounds (joy, tickling, taunting, schadenfreude) either by classifying them according to the underlying emotion or by rating them according to different emotional dimensions. The authors found that emotions in laughter (a) can be classified into different emotional categories, and (b) can have distinctive profiles on W. Wundt's (1905) emotional dimensions. This shows that laughter is a multifaceted social behavior that can adopt various emotional connotations. The findings support the postulated function of laughter in establishing group structure, whereby laughter is used either to include or to exclude individuals from group coherence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 21 13%
Professor 10 6%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 46%
Computer Science 10 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2025.
All research outputs
#4,323,578
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Emotion
#721
of 2,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,163
of 204,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emotion
#23
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.