↓ Skip to main content

Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela J. T. Bosch, Theresa V. Rohm, Shefaa AlAsfoor, Andy J. Y. Low, Lena Keller, Zora Baumann, Neena Parayil, Marc Stawiski, Leila Rachid, Thomas Dervos, Sandra Mitrovic, Daniel T. Meier, Claudia Cavelti-Weder

Abstract

Air pollution has emerged as an unexpected risk factor for diabetes. However, the mechanism behind remains ill-defined. So far, the lung has been considered as the main target organ of air pollution. In contrast, the gut has received little scientific attention. Since air pollution particles can reach the gut after mucociliary clearance from the lungs and through contaminated food, our aim was to assess whether exposure deposition of air pollution particles in the lung or the gut drive metabolic dysfunction in mice. To study the effects of gut versus lung exposure, we exposed mice on standard diet to diesel exhaust particles (DEP; NIST 1650b), particulate matter (PM; NIST 1649b) or phosphate-buffered saline by either intratracheal instillation (30 µg 2 days/week) or gavage (12 µg 5 days/week) over at least 3 months (total dose of 60 µg/week for both administration routes, equivalent to a daily inhalation exposure in humans of 160 µg/m3 PM2.5) and monitored metabolic parameters and tissue changes. Additionally, we tested the impact of the exposure route in a "prestressed" condition (high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)). Mice on standard diet exposed to particulate air pollutants by intratracheal instillation developed lung inflammation. While both lung and gut exposure resulted in increased liver lipids, glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion was only observed in mice exposed to particles by gavage. Gavage with DEP created an inflammatory milieu in the gut as shown by up-regulated gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte/macrophage markers. In contrast, liver and adipose inflammation markers were not increased. Beta-cell secretory capacity was impaired on a functional level, most likely induced by the inflammatory milieu in the gut, and not due to beta-cell loss. The differential metabolic effects of lung and gut exposures were confirmed in a "prestressed" HFD/STZ model. We conclude that separate lung and gut exposures to air pollution particles lead to distinct metabolic outcomes in mice. Both exposure routes elevate liver lipids, while gut exposure to particulate air pollutants specifically impairs beta-cell secretory capacity, potentially instigated by an inflammatory milieu in the gut.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,753,223
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#103
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,069
of 426,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.