↓ Skip to main content

The beavertail modified radial forearm free flap: Retrospective review of a versatile technique to increase flap bulk in the head and neck

Overview of attention for article published in Microsurgery, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The beavertail modified radial forearm free flap: Retrospective review of a versatile technique to increase flap bulk in the head and neck
Published in
Microsurgery, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/micr.31028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishna S. Hanubal, William J. Reschly, Dustin Conrad, Bianca Maria Festa, Joshua P. Weiss, Mohamed Shama, Deepa Danan, Brian Hughley, Peter T. Dziegielewski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#13,868,036
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Microsurgery
#240
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,059
of 343,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microsurgery
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.