↓ Skip to main content

Whole slide image‐based prediction of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer using unsupervised artificial intelligence

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Endoscopy, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole slide image‐based prediction of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer using unsupervised artificial intelligence
Published in
Digestive Endoscopy, April 2023
DOI 10.1111/den.14547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuki Takashina, Shin‐ei Kudo, Yuta Kouyama, Katsuro Ichimasa, Hideyuki Miyachi, Yuichi Mori, Toyoki Kudo, Yasuharu Maeda, Yushi Ogawa, Takemasa Hayashi, Kunihiko Wakamura, Yuta Enami, Naruhiko Sawada, Toshiyuki Baba, Tetsuo Nemoto, Fumio Ishida, Masashi Misawa

Abstract

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical for determining the need for surgery after endoscopic resection because LNM occurs in 10%. We aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI) system using whole slide images (WSIs) to predict LNM. We conducted a retrospective single center study. To train and test the AI model, we included LNM status-confirmed T1 and T2 CRC between April 2001 and October 2021. These lesions were divided into two cohorts: training (T1 and T2) and testing (T1). WSIs were cropped into small patches and clustered by unsupervised K-means. The percentage of patches belonging to each cluster was calculated from each WSI. Each cluster's percentage, sex, and tumor location were extracted and learned using the random forest algorithm. We calculated the areas under the receiver operator characteristics curves (AUCs) to identify the LNM and the rate of over-surgery of the AI model and the guidelines. The training cohort contained 217 T1 and 268 T2 CRCs, while 100 T1 cases (LNM-positivity 15%) were the test cohort. The AUC of the AI system for the test cohort was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.86), and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.50-0.55) using the guidelines criteria (p=0.0028). This AI model could reduce the 21% of over-surgery compared to the guidelines. We developed a pathologist-independent predictive model for LNM in T1 CRC using WSI for determination of the need for surgery after endoscopic resection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,853,629
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Endoscopy
#419
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,959
of 421,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Endoscopy
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.