↓ Skip to main content

Coesite from Wabar Crater, near Al Hadida, Arabia

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 1961
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coesite from Wabar Crater, near Al Hadida, Arabia
Published in
Science, March 1961
DOI 10.1126/science.133.3456.882
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. C. T. Chao, J. J. Fahey, Janet Littler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 8%
Canada 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 67%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Science
#48,121
of 78,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.