You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Machine Intelligence, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s42256-023-00620-w |
| Authors |
Hugues Turbé, Mina Bjelogrlic, Christian Lovis, Gianmarco Mengaldo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 27% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 8 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#683,128
of 25,079,481 outputs
Outputs from Nature Machine Intelligence
#188
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,016
of 414,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Machine Intelligence
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.