↓ Skip to main content

Quartz Helix Magnetic Susceptibility Balance Using the Curie-Cheneveau Principle

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Scientific Instruments, May 1958
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quartz Helix Magnetic Susceptibility Balance Using the Curie-Cheneveau Principle
Published in
Review of Scientific Instruments, May 1958
DOI 10.1063/1.1716216
Authors

F. E. Senftle, M. D. Lee, A. A. Monkewicz, J. W. Mayo, Titus Pankey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 1979.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Review of Scientific Instruments
#2,153
of 10,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Scientific Instruments
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them