↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Power and Type 1 Error in Large Pedigree Analyses of Binary Traits

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating Power and Type 1 Error in Large Pedigree Analyses of Binary Traits
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062615
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2013.
All research outputs
#28,600,579
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#183,768
of 224,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,193
of 237,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,247
of 5,309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.