↓ Skip to main content

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q10 in Huntington disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q10 in Huntington disease
Published in
Neurology, December 2016
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew McGarry, Michael McDermott, Karl Kieburtz, Elisabeth A. de Blieck, Flint Beal, Karen Marder, Christopher Ross, Ira Shoulson, Peter Gilbert, William M. Mallonee, Mark Guttman, Joanne Wojcieszek, Rajeev Kumar, Mark S. LeDoux, Mary Jenkins, H. Diana Rosas, Martha Nance, Kevin Biglan, Peter Como, Richard M. Dubinsky, Kathleen M. Shannon, Padraig O'Suilleabhain, Kelvin Chou, Francis Walker, Wayne Martin, Vicki L. Wheelock, Elizabeth McCusker, Joseph Jankovic, Carlos Singer, Juan Sanchez-Ramos, Burton Scott, Oksana Suchowersky, Stewart A. Factor, Donald S. Higgins, Eric Molho, Fredy Revilla, John N. Caviness, Joseph H. Friedman, Joel S. Perlmutter, Andrew Feigin, Karen Anderson, Ramon Rodriguez, Nikolaus R. McFarland, Russell L. Margolis, Eric S. Farbman, Lynn A. Raymond, Valerie Suski, Sandra Kostyk, Amy Colcher, Lauren Seeberger, Eric Epping, Sherali Esmail, Nancy Diaz, Wai Lun Alan Fung, Alan Diamond, Samuel Frank, Philip Hanna, Neal Hermanowicz, Leon S. Dure, Merit Cudkowicz, John Adams, Mandar Jog, Christopher Hyson, Sarah Furtado, Andrew Duker, Melissa Armstrong, Christian Lachner, Hubert Fernandez, Michael S Okun, David Shprecher, Michael Cartwright, Clement Loy, Joohi Jiminez-Shahed, Bradley Robottom, Gregory Suter, Theresa Moore, Jane Forsyth, Andrea Hurt, Joann Belden, Katie Price, Diane Erickson, Breanna Nickels, Misty M Thompson, Linda Cole, Julie Megens, Emilija Makaji, Sara-Lynn Masse, Keith Malarick, Louisa Mook, Susan Maya, Alex Bender, Jessica Meyer, Puja Turakhia, Katherine Harwood, Kathryn Duderstadt, Sarah Lenarz, Judy Hamerlinck, Patricia Edern, Charlyne Hickey, Ashley Owens, Clare Gibbons, Carolyn Gray, Jean A Jaglin, Kimberly Janko, Holly Lawrence, Barbara Estes, Brigid Hayward, Allison Johnson, Amit Gode, Giselle Huet, Beverly Romero-Kersh, Kristine Wernette, Elizabeth Sullivan, Jamie Guyot, Julie Konkle, Christine O'Neill, Pamela King, Amanda Martin, John Bautista, Nicole Mans, Jane Griffith, Erica Surles, Sharon Halton, Alicia Palao, Nathalie Padron, Kolleen Elliott, Lynn Oelke, London Butterfield, Peggy Perry-Trice, Sarah Wyne, Carol Pantella, Lorelei Tainsh, Elaine Sperin, Sharon Evans, Maureen Gartner, Amy Duffy, Pamela Kristof, Lisa Niles, Steven Rainone, Angie Wernle, Ronda Clouse, Michelle Cines, Kelly Dustin, Maura Deeley, Stacy Merritt, Heather Ferreri, Alison McMurray, Alanna Sheinberg, Marsha Hughes-Gay, Kori Ladonna, Erin Chung, Jennifer Lee, Rachel Goldstein, Lindsay Esposito, Nicholas Scoglio, Matthew Grana, Carol Zimmerman, Lucia M Blasucci, William Thayer, Jennifer Hawkins, Julia Koch, Victoria Hunt, Jessica Bargoil, Ingrid Scott, Terry Tempkin, Linda Stewart, Emily Hayes, Donna Galea, Beatriz Belmar, Kylie Richardson, Christine Hunter, Ernesto Jimenez, Monica Quesada, Wendy Levy, Anita Blenke, Lisa Gauger, Joanna Stoner, Mary Lou Klimek, Barbara Sommerfeld, Mary Eglow, Katy Regan, Erin Neefus, Marie Malikowski, Teri Radam, Marci Zomok, Margaret Lannon, Rhonda Agramonte, Johanna Hartlein, Constance Nickerson, Samantha Gibson, Erin Hastings Monari, Camille Swartz, Anne Smith-Bova, Randi Jones, Catherine Wielinski, Shanthi Graham, David Gunn, Jillian McMillan

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that chronic treatment of early-stage Huntington disease (HD) with high-dose coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) will slow the progressive functional decline of HD. We performed a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with early-stage HD (n = 609) were enrolled at 48 sites in the United States, Canada, and Australia from 2008 to 2012. Patients were randomized to receive either CoQ 2,400 mg/d or matching placebo, then followed for 60 months. The primary outcome variable was the change from baseline to month 60 in Total Functional Capacity score (for patients who survived) combined with time to death (for patients who died) analyzed using a joint-rank analysis approach. An interim analysis for futility revealed a conditional power of <5% for the primary analysis, prompting premature conclusion in July 2014. No statistically significant differences were seen between treatment groups for the primary or secondary outcome measures. CoQ was generally safe and well-tolerated throughout the study. These data do not justify use of CoQ as a treatment to slow functional decline in HD. NCT00608881. This article provides Class I evidence that CoQ does not slow the progressive functional decline of patients with HD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 12 5%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 86 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 98 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#338,913
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#781
of 23,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,043
of 418,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#16
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.