↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of invasive respiratory mycoses in the immunocompromised host

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 1,160)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis of invasive respiratory mycoses in the immunocompromised host
Published in
Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000955
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamish Houston, Andrew J. Wilson, Neil Stone

Abstract

The burden of invasive fungal infection is increasing worldwide, largely due to a growing population at-risk. Most serious human fungal pathogens enter the host via the respiratory tract. Early identification and treatment of invasive fungal respiratory infections (IFRIs) in the immunocompromised host saves lives. However, their accurate diagnosis is a difficult challenge for clinicians and mortality remains high. This article reviews IFRIs, focussing on host susceptibility factors, clinical presentation, and mycological diagnosis. Several new diagnostic tools are coming of age including molecular diagnostics and point-of-care antigen tests. As diagnosis of IFRI relies heavily on invasive procedures like bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy, several novel noninvasive diagnostic techniques are in development, such as metagenomics, 'volatilomics' and advanced imaging technologies. Where IFRI cannot be proven, clinicians must employ a 'weights-of-evidence' approach to evaluate host factors, clinical and mycological data. Implementation studies are needed to understand how new diagnostic tools can be best applied within clinical pathways. Differentiating invasive infection from colonization and identifying antifungal resistance remain key challenges. As our diagnostic arsenal expands, centralized clinical mycology laboratories and efforts to ensure access to new diagnostics in low-resource settings will become increasingly important.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,478,799
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
#25
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,904
of 429,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in pulmonary medicine
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.