Hearing loss is increasingly prevalent among younger adults, impacting health and health care use. Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) women have a higher risk of chronic diseases, pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes compared to hearing women. Health care utilization patterns during the perinatal period, remains not well understood. The objective was to examine differences in antenatal emergency department and inpatient utilization among DHH and non-DHH women.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study design to analyze 2002-2013 Massachusetts Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal data to compare antenatal inpatient and emergency department use between DHH (N=925) and hearing (N=2895) women with singleton deliveries. Matching was done based on delivery year, age at delivery and birth parity in 1:3 case-control ratio. Demographic, socioeconomic, clinical and hospital characteristics were first compared for DHH mothers and the matched control group using chi-squared tests and t-tests. Multivariable models were adjusted for socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
Among DHH women (N=925), 49% had at least one emergency department visit, 19% had an observational stay, and 14% had a non-delivery hospital stay compared to 26%, 14%, and 6%, respectively among hearing women (N=2895) during the antenatal period (all p<0.001). The risk of non-delivery emergency department visits (RR 1.58; p<0.001) and inpatient stays (RR 1.89; p<0.001) remained higher among DHH women compared to hearing women even after adjustment. Having four or more antenatal emergency department visits (7% vs. 2%) and two or more non-delivery hospital stays (4% vs. 0.4%) were more common among pregnant DHH women compared to their controls (all P<0.001).
The findings demonstrate that DHH women use emergency departments and inpatient services at a significantly higher rate than their hearing controls during the antenatal period. A systematic investigation of the mechanisms for these findings are needed.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2023.
All research outputs
#19,011,832
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Perinatology
#2,089
of 2,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,112
of 256,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Perinatology
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
