You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Views of female genital mutilation survivors, men and health-care professionals on timing of deinfibulation surgery and NHS service provision: qualitative FGM Sister Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., March 2023
|
DOI | 10.3310/jhwe4771 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura Jones, Emma Danks, Benjamin Costello, Kate Jolly, Fiona Cross-Sudworth, Pallavi Latthe, Meg Fassam-Wright, Joanne Clarke, Alison Byrne, Julie Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 69% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,956,843
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#320
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,949
of 422,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.