You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extracellular vesicle–matrix interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Materials, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41578-023-00551-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koushik Debnath, Kevin Las Heras, Ambar Rivera, Stephen Lenzini, Jae-Won Shin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 54% |
| Scientists | 20 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 26% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,169,895
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Materials
#118
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,341
of 438,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Materials
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.