↓ Skip to main content

Reducing the risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with left breast tumor.

Overview of attention for article published in Orvosi Hetilap, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing the risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with left breast tumor.
Published in
Orvosi Hetilap, March 2023
DOI 10.1556/650.2023.32740
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsófia Dankovics, Tamás Ungvári, Döme Szabó, András Heim, Béla Farkas, Balázs Kiss, András Csejtei, Judit Olajos

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women. Treatment with drugs and radiotherapy increases the incidence of late cardiovascular disease. It is therefore particularly important to protect the heart from radiation exposure. We prepared an irradiation plan for 45 patients with left breast cancer using deep breathing and normal breathing techniques. The plans were compared and analyzed. The irradiation plans were created in the Philips Pinnacle v. 16 planning system. At the same target volume coverage, the use of the deep breathing technique leads to a reduction of the dose burden to the heart and to the left descending coronary branch, thus reducing the incidence of late cardiovascular complications. The results obtained show that the use of the deep breathing technique during adjuvant radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer patients has a beneficial effect on the radiation exposure of the heart. Our results are in good agreement with similar data from national centres. We were not only able to maintain planning target volume coverage, but also to achieve an improvement of 1%. There is a significant difference in dose to the heart and coronary artery. By using the deep breathing technique, we were able to reduce the average cardiac dose by almost half (deep breathing: 2.87 Gy, normal breathing: 5.4 Gy). The coronary exposure was reduced from 19.5 Gy to 10.98 Gy. The accuracy of treatment can be further improved by using a respiratory gating system with a surface-guided radiotherapy system. The successful use of deep breathing technique requires professionalism of the treatment staff and good patient cooperation. It is less equipment intensive than a respiration-guided system. The deep breathing technique is no longer considered state-of-the-art in the era of breath-holding, but the experience gained in our department is worth describing because of its relevance to oncocardiology. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(11): 420-425.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,193,293
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Orvosi Hetilap
#254
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,232
of 423,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orvosi Hetilap
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.