Reliability and Validity of an Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Normal Cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia: Implications for Multicenter Research Studies

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, April 2010

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 70 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Reliability and Validity of an Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Normal Cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia: Implications for Multicenter Research Studies
Published in	American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, April 2010
DOI	10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181c534a0
Pubmed ID	20306566
Authors	Ranjan Duara, David A. Loewenstein, Maria Greig, Amarilis Acevedo, Elizabeth Potter, Jason Appel, Ashok Raj, John Schinka, Elizabeth Schofield, Warren Barker, Yougui Wu, Huntington Potter
Abstract	The traditional consensus diagnosis (ConsDx) of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia relies on the reconciliation of an informant-based report of cognitive and functional impairment by a physician diagnosis (PhyDx), and a neuropsychological diagnosis (NPDx). As this procedure may be labor intensive and influenced by the philosophy and biases of a clinician, the diagnostic algorithm (AlgDx) was developed to identify individuals as cognitively normal, with MCI, or dementia.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Netherlands	1	1%
United Kingdom	1	1%
Unknown	68	97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	9	13%
Student > Master	9	13%
Researcher	9	13%
Student > Bachelor	8	11%
Student > Doctoral Student	5	7%
Other	12	17%
Unknown	18	26%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	12	17%
Psychology	11	16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	4	6%
Nursing and Health Professions	3	4%
Neuroscience	3	4%
Other	14	20%
Unknown	23	33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.

All research outputs

#6,187,596

of 34,763,505 outputs

Outputs from American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry

#761

of 2,799 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#29,212

of 149,309 outputs

Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: Official Journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry

of 19 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.