↓ Skip to main content

Hydrocortisone in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrocortisone in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2215145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre-François Dequin, Ferhat Meziani, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Toufik Kamel, Jean-Damien Ricard, Julio Badie, Jean Reignier, Nicholas Heming, Gaëtan Plantefève, Bertrand Souweine, Guillaume Voiriot, Gwenhaël Colin, Jean-Pierre Frat, Jean-Paul Mira, Nicolas Barbarot, Bruno François, Guillaume Louis, Sébastien Gibot, Christophe Guitton, Christophe Giacardi, Sami Hraiech, Sylvie Vimeux, Erwan L’Her, Henri Faure, Jean-Etienne Herbrecht, Camille Bouisse, Aurélie Joret, Nicolas Terzi, Arnaud Gacouin, Charlotte Quentin, Mercé Jourdain, Marie Leclerc, Carine Coffre, Hélène Bourgoin, Céline Lengellé, Caroline Caille-Fénérol, Bruno Giraudeau, Amélie Le Gouge

Abstract

Whether the antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of glucocorticoids may decrease mortality among patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia is unclear. In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned adults who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for severe community-acquired pneumonia to receive intravenous hydrocortisone (200 mg daily for either 4 or 8 days as determined by clinical improvement, followed by tapering for a total of 8 or 14 days) or to receive placebo. All the patients received standard therapy, including antibiotics and supportive care. The primary outcome was death at 28 days. A total of 800 patients had undergone randomization when the trial was stopped after the second planned interim analysis. Data from 795 patients were analyzed. By day 28, death had occurred in 25 of 400 patients (6.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9 to 8.6) in the hydrocortisone group and in 47 of 395 patients (11.9%; 95% CI, 8.7 to 15.1) in the placebo group (absolute difference, -5.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.6 to -1.7; P = 0.006). Among the patients who were not undergoing mechanical ventilation at baseline, endotracheal intubation was performed in 40 of 222 (18.0%) in the hydrocortisone group and in 65 of 220 (29.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.86). Among the patients who were not receiving vasopressors at baseline, such therapy was initiated by day 28 in 55 of 359 (15.3%) of the hydrocortisone group and in 86 of 344 (25.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.82). The frequencies of hospital-acquired infections and gastrointestinal bleeding were similar in the two groups; patients in the hydrocortisone group received higher daily doses of insulin during the first week of treatment. Among patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia being treated in the ICU, those who received hydrocortisone had a lower risk of death by day 28 than those who received placebo. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; CAPE COD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02517489.).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,751 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 348 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 55 16%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 6%
Other 71 20%
Unknown 118 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Unspecified 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 118 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1404. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#9,047
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#448
of 32,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274
of 424,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#8
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.