↓ Skip to main content

From Drugs to Dry Mouth: A Systematic Review Exploring Oral and Psychological Health Conditions Associated with Dry Mouth in Older Adults with Polypharmacy

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Drugs to Dry Mouth: A Systematic Review Exploring Oral and Psychological Health Conditions Associated with Dry Mouth in Older Adults with Polypharmacy
Published in
Drugs & Aging, March 2023
DOI 10.1007/s40266-023-01017-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

India Cannon, Anna Robinson-Barella, Gillian McLellan, Sheena E. Ramsay

Abstract

Approximately 60% of older adults complain of dry mouth, which may be associated with polypharmacy, common in this population. Existing studies have reported treatment approaches to dry mouth but do not address long-term preventative measures that would more positively benefit the health and well-being of older adults. We aimed to explore the consequences of dry mouth, associated with polypharmacy, on the physical and psychological health of older adults in order to establish the importance of preventing dry mouth. This systematic review was conducted of studies reporting health conditions of dry mouth, in relation to polypharmacy in older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases were searched using keywords such as 'polypharmacy', 'dry mouth', 'oral health' and 'quality of life' (PROSPERO: CRD42021288945). Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to assess study quality. Of the 6852 citations screened, nine studies (cross-sectional, n = 8; longitudinal, n = 1) were included that comprised 37,459 participants (mean age range 68.5-85.0 years). Studies were published between 2005 and 2019. Because of the heterogeneity of reported study outcomes, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. The health conditions identified in this review were categorised as 'physical' or 'psychological'. The main physical health conditions reported in the studies related to dental health, such as tooth loss, and functional impairments, such as swallowing difficulties. An increase in the number of medicines taken, from 0 to 5, decreased the number of natural teeth remaining from 16 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) to 12 (SD ± 8), respectively. Additionally, the number of dental complications increased from 1 (SD ± 2) to 2 (SD ± 2) as the number of medicines increased from 1 to ≥ 3. There was a paucity of studies (n = 2) that investigated psychological health conditions of dry mouth among older adults, with depression identified as a significant issue among older adults with dry mouth (where the reported prevalence was as high as 64%). An additional six psychological health conditions were identified: self-consciousness, feeling tense, difficulty relaxing, irritability, difficulty completing tasks and feeling less satisfied in life. High levels of physical health conditions of dry mouth are observed in older adults and, to a lesser extent, psychological health conditions. These conditions can negatively affect quality of life. There remains a need to prevent dry mouth and the adverse health conditions associated with it in older adults. The modifiable nature of polypharmacy could be targeted to minimise, and potentially prevent, dry mouth. The optimisation of medication regimes to effectively treat chronic conditions, but also limit the likelihood of dry mouth, is a practical approach. Dry mouth prevention should be a priority and polypharmacy can pave the way for prevention strategies, avoiding the need to treat dry mouth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,844,720
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#82
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,471
of 426,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.