You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A non-randomized clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel sperm sex selection technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0282216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Cheung, Rony Elias, Philip Xie, Zev Rosenwaks, Gianpiero D. Palermo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 3 | 14% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1529. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,701
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91
of 224,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222
of 424,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5
of 6,016 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,016 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.