↓ Skip to main content

原発巣切除を施行した腹膜播種を伴う大腸癌の治療成績と予後因子

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
原発巣切除を施行した腹膜播種を伴う大腸癌の治療成績と予後因子
Published in
Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery, January 2017
DOI 10.5833/jjgs.2016.0133
Authors

稲垣 大輔, 塩澤 学, 里吉 哲太, 渥美 陽介, 風間 慶祐, 樋口 晃生, 利野 靖, 益田 宗孝

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
#60
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,910
of 424,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them