↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of an Equivalence Point for Change in V[Combining Dot Above]CO2 and V[Combining Dot Above]O2 to Endurance Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationship of an Equivalence Point for Change in V[Combining Dot Above]CO2 and V[Combining Dot Above]O2 to Endurance Performance
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31826549ef
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There are many tests available to coaches and practitioners who seek to identify a point during exercise when excess lactate is being produced or hyperventilation stimulated as a result of metabolic acidosis. This investigation sought to determine the relationship between performance and the first occurrence of excess CO2 production because of increased ventilatory buffering. For this investigation, 2 separate studies were conducted, each examined the predictive value of the 2 standard ventilatory threshold (VT) assessments (V-Slope and examination of ventilatory equilvalents) and the point of equivalence in change (PEC) against performance in an endurance race. The PEC was determined by examining the third-order trend for V[Combining Dot Above]CO2 and V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and determining where the change by time was equivalent (ΔV[Combining Dot Above]O2/ΔV[Combining Dot Above]O2 = 1). The first study examined the assessments of PEC vs. VT in a population of 10-km race competitors (study 1) and the second a population of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division 1 crosscountry runners (study 2). Partial correlations (controlled for weight) were used to assess the relationships with performance. In study 1, the partial correlations revealed that the PEC had the highest correlation to race performance (r = 0.961, p < 0.001) compared with the other techniques (V-slope r = 0.890, p < 0.001, ventilatory equivalents r = 0.733, p = 0.01). Analyses of difference in strength of correlations within study 1 demonstrated differences between PEC and mean race speed as compared with V-slope or ventilatory equivalents and mean race speed. In study 2, a similar trend was observed (PEC r = 0.863, p = 0.001, V-slope (r = 0.828, p = 0.002, ventilatory equivalents r = 0.750, p = 0.008). The results of this study suggest that determination of PEC is more related to 10-km race performance than 2 well-established methods for VT determination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 6 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#27,795,420
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#6,538
of 7,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,412
of 238,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#96
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.