↓ Skip to main content

Effects of afforestation by aerial sowing on topsoil physicochemical properties in the sandy desert, NW China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Soils and Sediments, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 507)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of afforestation by aerial sowing on topsoil physicochemical properties in the sandy desert, NW China
Published in
Journal of Soils and Sediments, March 2023
DOI 10.1007/s11368-023-03486-y
Authors

Weiyu Chen, Tengfei Yu, Tuo Han, Chenguang Zhao, Huiying Li, Xuejuan Liu, Junliang Liu, Xiaoyou Zhang

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,596,494
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#7
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,914
of 406,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.