↓ Skip to main content

Cloverleaf test (modified Hodge test) for detecting carbapenemase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae: be aware of false positive results

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cloverleaf test (modified Hodge test) for detecting carbapenemase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae: be aware of false positive results
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), December 2009
DOI 10.1093/jac/dkp431
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of carbapenemases in a Klebsiella pneumoniae collection and the performance of the modified Hodge test (MHT) to correctly identify this phenotype.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,406,143
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#1,352
of 10,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,360
of 238,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.