↓ Skip to main content

Fake-news-free evidence-based communication for proper vein-lymphatic disease management.

Overview of attention for article published in International Angiology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fake-news-free evidence-based communication for proper vein-lymphatic disease management.
Published in
International Angiology, March 2023
DOI 10.23736/s0392-9590.23.05044-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio Gianesini, Yung-Wei Chi, Chantal Agüero, Deena Alqedrah, Miguel Amore, Mohammad Barbati, Adriana Baturone, Stephen Black, Denis Borsuk, Oscar Bottini, Joseph Caprini, Marylin Chamo, Meena Cherian, Larisa Chernuka, Marianne DE Maeseneer, Josè Diaz, Mark J Garcia, Kathleen Gibson, Monika Gloviczki, Peter Gloviczki, Veronika Golovina, Elena Goranova, Lorena Grillo, Adam Gwozdz, Tobias Hirsch, Emad Hussein, Ernesto Intriago, Houman Jalaie, Aleksandra Jaworucka-Kaczorowska, Ravul Jindal, Matthieu Josnin, Neil M Khilnani, Dong-Ik Kim, Alejandro Latorre, Zaza Lazarashvili, Byung-Boong Lee, Luis Leon, Ngoh C Liew, Kirill Lobastov, Fedor Lurie, Annalisa Maghetti, Erica Menegatti, Kasuo Miyake, Makoto Mo, Sriram Narayanan, Diana Neuhardt, Felizitas Pannier, Alfredo Prego, Eberhard Rabe, Joseph Raffetto, Pauline Raymond-Martimbeau, Laura Redman, Lourdes Reina-Gutierrez, Rodrigo Rial, Stanley Rockson, Marco Romanelli, Fabricio R Santiago, Raquel A Santiago, Nuttawut Sermsathanasawadi, Evgeny Shaydakov, Carlos Simkin, Joel Sousa, Julianne Stoughton, Andrzej Szuba, Wassila Taha, Jorge Ulloa, Tomasz Urbanek, Marco Vitale, Marc Vuylsteke, Jinsong Wang, Janaina Weingartner, Spencer Wilson, Takashi Yamaki, Yeejia Ng, Igor Zolotukhin, Armando Mansilha

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 17 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Arts and Humanities 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,961,368
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from International Angiology
#152
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,733
of 438,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Angiology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.