↓ Skip to main content

Expressions of Machismo in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among New Mexico Hispanic Subpopulations

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Health Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expressions of Machismo in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among New Mexico Hispanic Subpopulations
Published in
Qualitative Health Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1177/1049732311424509
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although national colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates have steadily decreased, the rate for New Mexico Hispanics has been increasing, and screening rates are low. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study to determine barriers to CRC screening for New Mexico Hispanics. We found that machismo served as a dynamic influence on men's health-seeking behaviors; however, it was conceptualized differently by two distinct Hispanic subpopulations, and therefore appeared to play a different role in shaping their screening attitudes and behaviors. Machismo emerged as more of an influence for Mexican men, who expressed concern over colonoscopies being potentially transformative and/or stigmatizing, but was not as salient for Hispanos, who viewed the colonoscopy as "strictly medical," and were more concerned with discomfort and pain. Findings from the study highlight the importance of identifying varying characteristics among subpopulations to better understand screening barriers and provide optimal CRC screening counseling in primary care settings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Psychology 22 18%
Social Sciences 21 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#21,490,139
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Health Research
#1,720
of 2,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,574
of 158,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Health Research
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.