You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability and accuracy of single-molecule FRET studies for characterization of structural dynamics and distances in proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-023-01807-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ganesh Agam, Christian Gebhardt, Milana Popara, Rebecca Mächtel, Julian Folz, Benjamin Ambrose, Neharika Chamachi, Sang Yoon Chung, Timothy D. Craggs, Marijn de Boer, Dina Grohmann, Taekjip Ha, Andreas Hartmann, Jelle Hendrix, Verena Hirschfeld, Christian G. Hübner, Thorsten Hugel, Dominik Kammerer, Hyun-Seo Kang, Achillefs N. Kapanidis, Georg Krainer, Kevin Kramm, Edward A. Lemke, Eitan Lerner, Emmanuel Margeat, Kirsten Martens, Jens Michaelis, Jaba Mitra, Gabriel G. Moya Muñoz, Robert B. Quast, Nicole C. Robb, Michael Sattler, Michael Schlierf, Jonathan Schneider, Tim Schröder, Anna Sefer, Piau Siong Tan, Johann Thurn, Philip Tinnefeld, John van Noort, Shimon Weiss, Nicolas Wendler, Niels Zijlstra, Anders Barth, Claus A. M. Seidel, Don C. Lamb, Thorben Cordes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 10% |
| Germany | 8 | 9% |
| France | 5 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 48% |
| Scientists | 43 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#446,859
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#543
of 5,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,240
of 421,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#13
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.