You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accessible versatility underpins the deep evolution of plant specialized metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-023-09863-2 |
| Authors |
Armin Dadras, Tim P. Rieseberg, Jaccoline M. S. Zegers, Janine M. R. Fürst-Jansen, Iker Irisarri, Jan de Vries, Sophie de Vries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 12 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 54% |
| Scientists | 23 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,299,168
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#12
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,099
of 423,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them