↓ Skip to main content

The Utility of a “Second-Look” Debridement Following Endonasal Skull Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Neurosurgery, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Utility of a “Second-Look” Debridement Following Endonasal Skull Base Surgery in the Pediatric Population
Published in
Seminars in Neurosurgery, March 2023
DOI 10.1055/a-2048-7564
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael T. Chang, Alice E. Huang, Jennifer L. Quon, Juan C. Fernandez-Miranda, Christopher Z. Wen, Jacob G. Eide, Rijul S. Kshirsagar, Z Jason Qian, Jayakar V. Nayak, Peter H. Hwang, Nithin D. Adappa, Zara M. Patel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,483,224
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Neurosurgery
#82
of 1,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,171
of 426,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Neurosurgery
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.