| Title |
Safety and Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason R. Westin, Frederick L. Locke, Michael Dickinson, Armin Ghobadi, Mahmoud Elsawy, Tom van Meerten, David B. Miklos, Matthew L. Ulrickson, Miguel-Angel Perales, Umar Farooq, Luciano Wannesson, Lori Leslie, Marie José Kersten, Caron A. Jacobson, John M. Pagel, Gerald Wulf, Patrick Johnston, Aaron P. Rapoport, Linqiu Du, Saran Vardhanabhuti, Simone Filosto, Jina Shah, Julia T. Snider, Paul Cheng, Christina To, Olalekan O. Oluwole, Anna Sureda |
| Abstract |
Older patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may be considered ineligible for curative-intent therapy including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT). Here, we report outcomes of a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients ≥65 years in ZUMA-7. Patients with LBCL refractory to or relapsed ≤12 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy] or standard of care (SOC; 2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by HDT-ASCT). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Fifty-one and 58 patients aged ≥65 years were randomized to axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Median EFS was greater with axi-cel versus SOC (21.5 vs. 2.5 months; median follow-up: 24.3 months; HR, 0.276; descriptive P < 0.0001). Objective response rate was higher with axi-cel versus SOC (88% vs. 52%; OR, 8.81; descriptive P < 0.0001; complete response rate: 75% vs. 33%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 94% of axi-cel and 82% of SOC patients. No grade 5 cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events occurred. In the quality-of-life analysis, the mean change in PRO scores from baseline at days 100 and 150 favored axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (descriptive P < 0.05). CAR T-cell expansion and baseline serum inflammatory profile were comparable in patients ≥65 and <65 years. Axi-cel is an effective second-line curative-intent therapy with a manageable safety profile and improved PROs for patients ≥65 years with R/R LBCL. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 48% |
| Scientists | 13 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 57% |