↓ Skip to main content

SALVO: Single-Arm Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SALVO: Single-Arm Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2023
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3207
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mucosal melanoma is a rare, aggressive form of melanoma with extremely high recurrence rates despite definitive surgical resection with curative intent. Currently there is no consensus on adjuvant therapy. Data on checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) for adjuvant therapy is lacking. We performed a single arm, multicenter clinical trial using "flip dose" ipilimumab (1mg/kg q3w x4 cycles), and nivolumab (3 mg/kg q3w x4 cycles), then Nivolumab 480 mg q4w x 11 cycles to complete a year of adjuvant therapy. Participants must have had R0/R1 resection <90 days prior to registration, no prior systemic therapy (adjuvant radiation allowed), ECOG 0/1, no uncontrolled autoimmune disease or other invasive cancer. Patients were recruited through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Oncology Network. From Sept 2017 to August 2021 35 patients enrolled. Of these, 29 (83%) had R0 resections, and 7 (20%) received adjuvant radiation. Median age was 67 years, 21 (60.0%) female. Relapse-free survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% (95% CI 31-66%) and 37% (95% CI 19-55%), respectively. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 87% (95% CI 68-95%) and 68% (95% CI 46-83%), respectively. Median RFS was 14.3 m (95% CI 5.7-25.8). Most common grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (14%), hypertension (14%), and hyponatremia (11%), with no grade 4/5 toxicities. Flip dose ipilimumab and nivolumab after resection of mucosal melanoma is associated with outcomes improved over that of surgical resection alone. Long term follow up, subgroup analyses and correlative studies are ongoing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 16%
Other 3 16%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,633,606
of 30,056,308 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#6,794
of 14,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,888
of 433,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#60
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,056,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.