↓ Skip to main content

Transscleral vs endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation: safety and efficacy when combined with phacoemulsification

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transscleral vs endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation: safety and efficacy when combined with phacoemulsification
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, March 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12886-023-02877-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2026.
All research outputs
#20,559,908
of 32,692,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#846
of 3,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,818
of 439,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#18
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,692,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,055 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.