You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The First Differentiated TB Care Model From India: Delays and Predictors of Losses in the Care Cascade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Health : Science and Practice Journal, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00505 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hemant Deepak Shewade, Asha Frederick, G. Kiruthika, Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, Joshua Chadwick, T. Daniel Rajasekar, K. Gayathri, R. Vijayaprabha, R. Sabarinathan, Jeyashree Kathiresan, P.K. Bhavani, S. Aarthi, K.V. Suma, Delphina Peter Pathinathan, Raghavan Parthasarathy, M. Bhavani Nivetha, Jerome G. Thampi, Deiveegan Chidambaram, Tarun Bhatnagar, S. Lokesh, Shanmugasundaram Devika, Timothy S. Laux, Stalin Viswanathan, R. Sridhar, K. Krishnamoorthy, M. Sakthivel, S. Karunakaran, S. Rajkumar, M. Ramachandran, K.D. Kanagaraj, M. Kaleeswari, V.P. Durai, R. Saravanan, A. Sugantha, S. Zufire Hassan Mohamed Khan, P. Sangeetha, R. Vasudevan, R. Nedunchezhian, M. Sankari, N. Jeevanandam, S. Ganapathy, V. Rajasekaran, T. Mathavi, A.R. Rajaprakash, Lakshmi Murali, U. Pugal, K. Sundaralingam, S. Savithri, S. Vellasamy, D. Dheenadayal, P. Ashok, K. Jayasree, R. Sudhakar, K.P. Rajan, N. Tharageshwari, D. Chokkalingam, S.M. Anandrajkumar, T.S. Selvavinayagam, C. Padmapriyadarshini, Ranjani Ramachandran, Manoj V. Murhekar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 31 | 53% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 68% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#740,058
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Global Health : Science and Practice Journal
#27
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,141
of 425,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health : Science and Practice Journal
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.