You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimal multiwave validation of secondary use data with outcome and exposure misclassification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Canadian Journal of Statistics, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cjs.11772 |
| Authors |
Sarah C. Lotspeich, Gustavo G. C. Amorim, Pamela A. Shaw, Ran Tao, Bryan E. Shepherd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,092,639
of 25,899,121 outputs
Outputs from The Canadian Journal of Statistics
#4
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,839
of 427,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Canadian Journal of Statistics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,899,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them