↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Campylobacter jejuni Infection in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
8 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
23 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experimental Campylobacter jejuni Infection in Humans
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, March 1988
DOI 10.1093/infdis/157.3.472
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Two strains of Campylobacter jejuni ingested by 111 adult volunteers, in doses ranging from 8 x 10(2) to 2 x 10(9) organisms, caused diarrheal illnesses. Rates of infection increased with dose, but development of illness did not show a clear dose relation. Resulting illnesses with strain A3249 ranged from a few loose stools to dysentery, with an average of five diarrheal stools and a volume of 509 mL. Infection with strain 81-176 was more likely to cause illness, and these illnesses were more severe, with an average of 15 stools and 1484 mL of total stool volume. All patients had fecal leukocytes. The dysenteric nature of the illness indicates that the pathogenesis of C. jejuni infection includes tissue inflammation. Ill volunteers developed a serum antibody response to the C. jejuni group antigen and were protected from subsequent illness but not infection with the same strain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 324 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 22%
Student > Bachelor 45 14%
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 82 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 5%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 88 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,239,516
of 29,430,452 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#934
of 16,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138
of 14,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,430,452 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.